<!-- --><!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(http://beta.blogger.com/css/navbar/classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-account' content='ca-host-pub-1556223355139109'/> <meta name='google-adsense-platform-domain' content='blogspot.com'/> <!-- --><style type="text/css">@import url(https://www.blogger.com/static/v1/v-css/navbar/3334278262-classic.css); div.b-mobile {display:none;} </style> </head><body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/20175868?origin\x3dhttp://renogen.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script> <iframe src="http://beta.blogger.com/navbar.g?blogID=36048451" height="30px" width="100%" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" id="navbar-iframe" frameborder="0"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>
Sunday, June 14, 2009

Have you ever encountered a promise to watch a certain movie, that you want to watch alot with him/her, made by someone close to you, but end up she/he went to watch with other people? It is just so irritating and disappointing.

She promised me that she will watch with me in the weekend, but who knows, she ended up watching with someone else. Fancy telling me not to worry as she will be watching with me when I meet her today, but minutes ago on the phone, she said she watched it with another guy just yesterday!

Why can't people just stick to their promises? Why can't these people just say "no" to watching that particular show that you have agreed to watch with someone else? Why must you watch that particular show just because you and him got nothing else to watch?

Also, I hate it when these people still say they are willing to watch with me for the 2nd time. It's just so wrong! Imagine you watch a horror movie twice, there's nothing to be scared already. You know where the thrill will appear, where the ghost or shadow will just pop up from no where. What's the point to watch it again? You won't be scared? You are just going there to keep me accompanied. I hate that.

So if you ever promised me to watch the particular show, please don't watch it with others. And if you watched it already, don't act kind and offer to watch it with me again. I just don't like it!

Labels: , ,


Blogged @ 12:26 PM
Don't let me go -


Today, I reaffirmed that communication between a couple is so important that it can improve their relationship. Even without physical contacts (for eg. holding hands, hugging, kissing, etc), just be chatting through the phone/MSN/Skype, etc, they still can be attracted to one another. That is the same if they are far apart geographically.

As there isn't much use of the sense of sight, one can only rely on their hearing and the heart to try to understand the different tone from the opposite during a conversation. Depicting the correct tone will mean understanding what the opposite is trying to say, thus, allowing you to think of a reply that is acceptable.

To conclude for this post, one can fall in love just be chatting even it's without physical contact. The moment you are thinking of him/her and missing the wonderful chat that you and him/her had been having, then that's it.

Labels: , ,


Blogged @ 2:42 AM
Don't let me go -

Thursday, June 11, 2009

So, what is this pleasing and charming thing? Well, it's something that to do with a courtship. If a guy charms a girl, he's making the girl to fall for him and his character. If it's pleasing, that will mean the guy trying to be the dream bf that the girl wants.

Love or to be loved, that's the origin for the title of this post I guess. Friends around me have been telling me different answers to which they preferred. Loving someone is just like trying your best to please the other one so that he or she can in turn return you the pleasing part. To be loved, will of course, be the opposite. It is when you are receiving the adore of someone and reciprocating lesser or none at all. Thus, the latter will be manipulating the whole relationship.

Because due to the fact that when you are a please-er, you will tend to change yourself or pretend to be someone that's not the true you. It will get more and more tiring even if you are yourself but trying to please him/her as you are putting much more efforts. Especially when there is no much response from the other person, you will feel extremely disappointing.

A charmer on the other hand, doesn't really need to put in much effort to try and think of some surprises to gain an upper hand in the game of courtship. The fact that he only need to do what he normally does, will already attract the opposite gender into his/her lair, dominating the game already. As little effort is required, the result of his/her actions, will not be of much impact/effect to his/her morale.

Well, I had been in both roles before. Only till this day, then I think that being a Charmer is more relaxing. Loving someone at the start of a courtship, is too tiring and you really have to face alot of emotional obstacles. Guess I prefer to manipulate than to being manipulated by love.

Labels: , , , , ,


Blogged @ 10:29 PM
Don't let me go -


Ok, so i guess i shall be starting to my random thoughts here already. since it will be useful or memorable one day, to recall what random thoughts i have in my progress of life.

Blogged @ 10:27 PM
Don't let me go -